Kelly Criterion Betting: How Much to Stake

By MakeItBigToday Editorial Team · Published 2026-10-28

The short answer

With decimal odds d and your estimated win probability p, the Kelly stake is f* = (p × d − 1) / (d − 1), the fraction of your bankroll to bet. If the result is zero or negative, you have no edge and should not bet. Many bettors stake half or a quarter of that fraction because probability estimates are rarely exact.

Short answer: the Kelly stake is f* = (p × d − 1) / (d − 1), where p is your estimated probability of winning and d is the decimal odds. If f* comes out zero or negative, you have no edge and the right stake is nothing.

That second sentence is the part people skip. Kelly is not a way to find good bets. It only answers “how much?” after you already believe a bet is priced in your favor, and its answer is only as good as your probability estimate. Every number in this guide is hypothetical, and none of it is a promise of profit.

The formula comes from John L. Kelly Jr.’s 1956 paper “A New Interpretation of Information Rate” in the Bell System Technical Journal, written about information theory rather than sports betting. Bettors and investors adopted it later because it describes the stake size that maximizes long-run growth of a bankroll when the edge is known.

The formula in one line

f* = (p × d − 1) / (d − 1)

The top of the fraction, p × d − 1, is your expected profit per unit staked. If you are unsure how to read or convert odds, my guide to sports betting odds covers decimal, fractional and American formats. The idea of a positive expected value is the same one behind value betting and expected value in poker.

Worked example (hypothetical numbers)

Assume a $1,000 bankroll and a bet at decimal odds of 2.10. You estimate the chance of winning at 52%.

Full Kelly says stake about $84. Because Kelly uses your current bankroll, the next stake is recalculated after each result: smaller after a loss, larger after a win.

Now change one input. If your honest estimate is 47% instead of 52%, then 0.47 × 2.10 − 1 = −0.013. The result is negative, so Kelly says do not bet at those odds.

Full vs half vs quarter Kelly

Using the same hypothetical $1,000 bankroll and 52% estimate at odds of 2.10:

ApproachFraction of bankrollStake
Full Kellyabout 8.4%about $84
Half Kellyabout 4.2%about $42
Quarter Kellyabout 2.1%about $21

Full Kelly is the theoretical growth-maximizing stake only if p is exactly right. In practice it produces deep drawdowns along the way, and a small overestimate of p pushes you into overbetting. Fractional Kelly trades some growth for a smoother ride and a buffer against your own estimation error. That is the main reason half Kelly is so common, and why cautious bettors go lower still.

Estimating p without fooling yourself

Since everything rides on p, the practical work is in estimating it. Start from the price: decimal odds of 2.10 imply roughly a 47.6% chance (1 ÷ 2.10) before you account for the bookmaker margin. Your estimate needs a reason to differ from that number, such as a model you have tested on past results or information the market has not priced. If you cannot explain why your 52% beats the market’s 47.6%, treat the gap as zero and do not bet.

Keep a record of every estimate next to the outcome. Over a large hypothetical sample, events you rated at 60% should win close to 60% of the time. If they win less, your estimates run hot, and the honest fix is to lower p or move to a smaller fraction of Kelly until your record says otherwise.

When Kelly breaks

Kelly is a sizing rule built on assumptions, and it stops being useful when they fail:

Kelly for traders

Some traders use Kelly thinking as a cap on position size: the stronger and more reliable the edge, the larger the position can be, and with no edge the position is zero. The simple formula assumes fixed win and loss payoffs, which trades rarely have, so a direct plug-in can mislead. A fixed-risk approach like the one in my position sizing calculator guide is easier to apply, with Kelly used as a sanity check that you are not sizing beyond any plausible edge.

Responsible gambling

Gambling is for adults 18+ (21+ in some places), and only with money you can afford to lose. No staking method removes the house edge or guarantees a win. Set limits before you start and stop if betting stops being entertainment. If gambling is causing problems for you or someone close to you, the National Council on Problem Gambling lists confidential help, including the 1-800-GAMBLER helpline in the US. In the UK, BeGambleAware offers free, confidential support; other countries have their own local services.

This article is for education only. All figures are hypothetical, and nothing here is betting, investment or financial advice.

Frequently asked questions

What is the Kelly criterion formula?

For decimal odds d and win probability p, the Kelly fraction is f* = (p × d − 1) / (d − 1). It tells you what share of your current bankroll to stake. With a hypothetical 55% chance at odds of 2.00, f* = (0.55 × 2 − 1) / 1 = 0.10, or 10%.

What does a negative Kelly result mean?

A zero or negative f* means the odds do not pay enough for your estimated chance of winning, so the bet has no positive expected value by your own numbers. The Kelly answer is to stake nothing.

Why do most people use half Kelly?

Full Kelly assumes your probability is exactly right, and real estimates never are. Staking half or a quarter of the Kelly fraction gives up some growth in exchange for much smaller swings and more room for estimation error.

What happens if I overestimate my win probability?

Kelly then recommends a stake that is too large, and overbetting is the expensive direction to be wrong. If your true edge is zero or negative, any stake loses money over time no matter how it is sized.

How do I use Kelly with several bets at once?

The simple formula is for one bet at a time. With simultaneous bets, sizing each one as if it were alone can put too much of the bankroll at risk together. A common practical approach is to cap total exposure and scale each stake down.

Can the Kelly criterion be used for trading?

The idea carries over as a way to think about position size relative to edge, but trading outcomes are not fixed win or lose payoffs, and edge is hard to measure. Most traders who use it treat it as a ceiling and size well below it.

Does the Kelly criterion guarantee I won't lose?

No. Kelly cannot guarantee profit or protect you from losing streaks. It only sizes bets given an edge you estimate, and if that estimate is wrong, or there is no real edge, you can and will lose money.

MakeItBigToday Editorial Team — MakeItBigToday staff, who are members of BYDFi's business development team. Guides are drafted with AI writing tools and the math is checked before publishing. The guides do not describe a personal trading history.